May 18 17:50:34 sd-45290 postfix/smtp: 2BBBAF40AB4: lost connection with while performing the HELO handshake May 18 17:50:34 sd-45290 postfix/smtp: E4F64F40AB5: lost connection with while performing the HELO handshake May 18 17:50:34 sd-45290 postfix/smtp: 766E8F40C92: lost connection with while performing the HELO handshake May 18 17:50:34 sd-45290 postfix/smtp: D1487F40CB0: lost connection with while performing the HELO handshake May 18 17:50:33 sd-45290 postfix/smtp: 766E8F40C92: lost connection with while performing the HELO handshake May 18 17:50:33 sd-45290 postfix/smtp: D1487F40CB0: lost connection with while performing the HELO handshake May 18 17:50:33 sd-45290 postfix/smtp: 2BBBAF40AB4: lost connection with while performing the HELO handshake May 18 17:50:33 sd-45290 postfix/smtp: E4F64F40AB5: lost connection with while performing the HELO handshake May 18 17:50:32 sd-45290 postfix/smtp: 2BBBAF40AB4: lost connection with while performing the HELO handshake May 18 17:50:32 sd-45290 postfix/smtp: E4F64F40AB5: lost connection with while performing the HELO handshake May 18 17:50:32 sd-45290 postfix/smtp: 766E8F40C92: lost connection with while performing the HELO handshake Received: from bart.localdomain (62.210.240.55) by id hfnbc211u9cn for Thu, 06:51:45 -0400 (envelope-from )Īuthentication-Results: spf=pass domainkeys=neutral (message not signed) dkim=neutral (message not signed)Īuthentication-Results: sender-id=pass by bart.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 33) A later attempt is unlikely to produce a final result. Is unrecoverable, such as a required header field beingĪbsent. Is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability This result SHOULD also be used for otherįailures not covered elsewhere in this list. The message was signed but the signature or signaturesĬontained syntax errors or were not otherwise able to be The message was signed but the signature or signatures were POWERMTA VS POSTFIX VERIFICATIONThe message was signed and the signature or signatures wereĪcceptable to the verifier, but they failed the verification The message was signed, the signature or signatures wereĪcceptable to the verifier, and the signature(s) passed Is unrecoverable, such as a required header field being absent orĪ syntax error in a retrieved DNS TXT record. Is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability to The message could not be verified due to some error that Unwilling to make a strong assertion to that effect. To inject or relay mail using the sender's DNS domain, but is The sender's ADMD believes the client was not authorized Relay mail using the sender's DNS domain. This client is explicitly not authorized to inject or Method's algorithm, but local policy dictates that the result is Of the sender's DNS domain according to the authentication The client is authorized to inject or relay mail on behalf Relay mail on behalf of the sender's DNS domain. The client is authorized by the sender's ADMD to inject or To send mail using the sender's DNS domain. Want to assert whether or not the sending IP address is authorized The sender's ADMD has asserted that it cannot or does not No policy records were published at the sender's DNS domain. 1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%Ġ.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in messageġ.7 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08 BODY: HTML: images with 400-800 bytes of wordsĮxplanation of the possible results (from RFC 5451) Version 3.2r11 or later to get a compatible version of DKIM. If you are using Port25's PowerMTA, you need to use (RFC 4871 or draft-ietf-dkim-base-10) and verification may fail for NOTE: DKIM checking has been performed based on the latest DKIM specs I can send and receive mail from gmail and others, but not hotmail. I cannot send mail to hotmail with my postfix server.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |